Look at the top of a cable tray in a plant whose floor is mopped twice a day. There will be a visible layer, and that layer is the honest measure of a dust programme: not how often someone cleans, but how much dust escaped capture. Buying a bigger vacuum does not change that number. Moving the hood does.
1. Why Sweeping Harder Does Not Work
A broom or an air lance lifts settled dust back into the air. Coarse particles fall nearby; fine particles travel and settle higher, on beams, fittings and cabinets. The next pass reaches the floor again. Repeat for a year and the workshop looks clean at eye level and fails an inspection at two metres.
Two enforcement cases published in China on 10 November 2026 follow that pattern: heavy dust accumulation at one plant, no cleaning system at another. Inspectors record what is visible; the dust came from generation points, not from an untidy floor.
Read the evidence correctly: a visible layer at two metres is not a cleaning-frequency problem. It is a capture problem that has been running for months, and the floor you mop every day is the last place it shows up.
2. The Three Capture Points
Dust leaves a process at three places, and each one needs a different countermeasure. Most failed programmes cover only the third.
| Capture Point |
Where It Happens |
What Actually Works |
What Does Not |
| Generation |
Cutting, grinding, drilling, crushing, dosing, bagging |
A hood at the tool — enclosed where possible, otherwise a close side-draft or receiving hood |
Floor cleaning after the fact |
| Transfer |
Drops between levels, machines, silos and bags |
Partial enclosures, shorter fall heights, sealed bin emptying |
Owning the point, but assigning it to no department |
| Settled dust |
Beams, fittings, cabinets, floor |
Filtered vacuum with a floor nozzle, then wet cleaning for oil-bound deposits |
Brooms and air lances, which re-suspend the fine fraction |
For generation and transfer, the question is not whether a hood exists, but whether it intercepts dust before the dust becomes room air. Transfer points are cheap to fix and easy to forget: they belong to no department, so nobody budgets for them.
For settled dust, remove it, do not agitate it. Dry first, wet second — vacuum picks up the loose fraction, and wet cleaning handles what is bound to the surface by oil or moisture.
3. The Hood Is the Cheapest Upgrade You Will Make
Capture performance decays fast with distance. For a free-standing hood, the airflow needed to control the same dispersion roughly quadruples when the distance doubles, using a point-source approximation.
| Hood Distance |
Relative Airflow Needed |
Practical Reading |
| 30 cm |
1× |
The working reference. A 351 m³/h unit can hold a tool-level hood here. |
| 60 cm |
≈4× |
Either four times the airflow, or acceptance that dust escapes. |
| 120 cm |
≈16× |
No mobile vacuum fixes this. Bring the hood back to the tool. |
This is why two machines with near-identical datasheets behave differently on site: the difference is not the motor, it is the hood and the duct. The cheapest retrofit is rarely a bigger vacuum — it is a shorter distance, a skirt on the hood, and a semi-enclosed station.
Capture velocity is the starting point. For general dust, 0.5–1.0 m/s across the hood face is a common range, higher for fine dust or stations near doors. Verify it with an anemometer, then confirm the flow pattern with a smoke test — a number that reads correctly at the face can still miss the dust cloud entirely.
4. Airflow and Vacuum Are Different Numbers
Airflow in cubic metres per hour governs whether the hood holds the dust and whether the duct carries it. Vacuum in kPa or mbar governs how much resistance the unit overcomes: long hoses, elbows, loaded filters, narrow nozzles. They are not interchangeable, and a single number on a datasheet tells you almost nothing on its own.
| Machine Type |
What It Does Well |
Where It Fails |
| High vacuum, low airflow |
Pulling material through a narrow nozzle, lifting from a crevice |
A long hose or a wide hood — the flow cannot cover the opening |
| High airflow, low vacuum |
Holding a large hood face and conveying dust down a duct |
A crevice tool or a heavily loaded filter — resistance chokes it |
Convert before comparing: 1 mbar equals 0.1 kPa. So 210 mbar is 21 kPa, while 37 kPa is 370 mbar. A catalogue that lists one unit against another is not lying — but the numbers are not comparable until you convert them.
Power in watts is an input, not an output. Two 1500 W units can deliver very different airflow and vacuum once the fan, the filter area and the inlet diameter differ. Ask for the output figures, then check them against your hood and duct.
5. Keep the Dust Moving in the Duct
After installation the common complaint is "it lost suction". Half the time it is a loaded filter; the other half, dust sitting in the duct. Below transport velocity, coarse particles settle, the free section narrows, velocity drops further, and the duct blocks — the failure accelerates itself.
| Material |
Typical Transport Velocity |
Note |
| Light, dry dust (packaging, textile fibre) |
≈15 m/s |
Lower end is acceptable, but never below the settling point |
| General mixed workshop dust |
≈18 m/s |
Safe default for mixed metal, plastic and mineral dust |
| Metal swarf, heavy grit |
≥20 m/s |
Highest requirement; short runs only |
Do not enlarge a duct for margin. A larger diameter means lower velocity and more settling — the instinct to oversize is exactly backwards. Minimise elbows, keep runs short, and seal the joints, because leaks hide at couplings and bin lids and quietly steal the flow you paid for. Portable units follow the same logic at a smaller scale: machine close, hose short, nozzle matched to the inlet.
6. Filtration and Filter Cleaning
Air returns to the room after filtration, so poor filtration sends the finest fraction straight back into the breathing zone. Three specifications decide the outcome, and only one of them is usually printed in bold.
| Specification |
What It Decides |
Selection Note |
| Rating |
The particle size the media is rated at — 0.3 micrometre is a common reference |
Rating and efficiency are separate claims. Ask for the efficiency figure separately. |
| Filter area |
How slowly pressure rise develops as dust loads the media |
Larger area means longer intervals between cleanings; near 250 m² supports continuous work. |
| Cleaning method |
Whether the unit can keep running without an operator |
Shaker for intermittent duty, pulse-jet for continuous heavy dust. |
A bad choice here does not show up as a failed machine. It shows up as an operator stopping every few hours to shake a filter, which in practice means the machine gets used less than planned and the tray stays dusty.
7. Five Questions Before Selection
Where does the dust come from, how much, and is it sticky or damp? Sticky dust bridges in ducts and on filter media; dry dust transports easily.
How many capture points, and how far is each hood from the source? Distance decides airflow far more than volume does.
How long is the duct, how many bends, how many machine connections? Every metre and every elbow is paid for in airflow.
How many hours per day, and can the unit stop for filter cleaning? Continuous operation demands larger filter area and pulse cleaning.
Is the dust combustible, and is the area classified? Ask this one first — it changes which machines are allowed at all.
8. Nameplate Data, for Reference Only
Verified figures from the current SIBEN catalogue, listed so the numbers above can be compared on a real datasheet. These are capacity figures, not performance guarantees — a 351 m³/h unit and a 531 m³/h unit can produce the same result at the hood if the duct is sized differently.
| Model |
Power |
Airflow |
Vacuum |
Filter |
Runtime / Notes |
| XC1500L (battery) |
DC 24 V, 1500 W (500 W × 3) |
351 m³/h |
37 kPa (≈370 mbar) |
0.3-micron, 250 m² area |
100 Ah lithium, 3–4 hrs, 100 L bin, 50 mm inlet |
| XC2100L (battery) |
DC lithium platform |
380 m³/h |
40 kPa |
0.3-micron class |
Manual pulse cleaning |
| XC2400T (corded) |
220 V, 2400 W |
354 m³/h |
210 mbar (≈21 kPa) |
0.3-micron class |
71 dB(A), fixed stations |
| XC3600T (corded) |
220 V |
531 m³/h |
— |
0.3-micron class |
Long arms, multiple points |
9. Log It, Then Retrofit
The cheapest specification document you will ever own is a log kept for one month. Five columns are enough; a sixth writes your retrofit list for you.
One month, six columns
Date — and the shift it was taken on
Station — the process, not the aisle
Equipment ID and nozzle
Hours run and filter cleanings
Anomalies — noise, loss of suction, hose damage
Dust observation — where a visible layer appeared today
That last column tells you which hood is too far, which transfer point has no enclosure, and which duct is settling. Retrofit in that order: capture first, duct second, equipment last. A shorter hood and a skirt are almost always cheaper than the next size of vacuum, and they work.
10. The Combustible Dust Boundary
This article stops here for classified areas: none of the above applies inside a classified combustible dust area. Access depends on a certified explosion-proof machine, its protection marking, a matching certificate and a site risk assessment — an "explosion-proof motor" note is not a machine certificate. This article summarises common industry practice; it is not a safety assessment or legal advice.
For ordinary, non-classified workshops the sequence is unglamorous and reliable: capture at the tool, keep the duct fast, filter before the air returns, and vacuum the settled dust instead of sweeping it. Cleaning is the last step, not the first.
Before you quote a machine, send the station details. If you change one thing this week, move the hood closer, add a skirt, and log where dust appears — the log usually changes which machine you need. SIBEN supports specification online: WhatsApp +86-400-880-1813 or email sales@zgsiben.com with your station layout, hood distance and duct run, and we will size airflow against the actual capture point. Filters and consumables ship from global stock.
Frequently Asked Questions
We installed a vacuum but dust still settles. Why?
Usually there is no capture point. Check whether a hood exists at the tool, and how far it sits from the dust source. Airflow without a hood only cleans the floor.
Does more power mean better cleaning?
No. Power in watts is an input; airflow and vacuum are the outputs. Two units with the same wattage can behave very differently once a hood and a duct are attached.
How close should a hood be?
As close as practical, commonly within 30 cm. For a free-standing hood, doubling the distance roughly quadruples the airflow needed to control the same cloud.
What capture velocity is enough?
Around 0.5–1.0 m/s across the hood face for general dust, higher for fine dust and near doors or cross-drafts. Measure it, then confirm the flow pattern with smoke.
Is 351 m³/h enough?
It depends on hood type, hood distance and duct resistance. Airflow figures are only meaningful together with the capture point and the duct run they serve.
How do kPa and mbar relate?
1 mbar = 0.1 kPa, so 210 mbar is 21 kPa and 37 kPa is 370 mbar. Convert before comparing datasheets.
Why do ducts clog over time?
Velocity falls below the transport velocity, particles settle, the free section narrows, velocity drops further, and the duct blocks. Keep 15–20 m/s depending on material.
What does 0.3 micrometre filtration mean?
A particle size reference, not an efficiency claim. Ask for efficiency separately, plus the sealed design that limits dust re-entering the room.
Shaker or pulse cleaning?
Shaker for light and intermittent duty, pulse-jet for continuous heavy dust, automatic pulse for minimum operator intervention.
Can a standard vacuum be used in a combustible dust area?
Not by default. It requires a certified explosion-proof machine with the correct marking, a matching certificate and a site assessment that allows it.